Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
276 kcal
Score
89 / 100
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has a higher nutrition quality score (89) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 276(-2.1%)
Score Diff
71 vs 89(+25.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter)
Higher energy
Acı paprika
Score leader
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter)
Nutrient split
9 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has 276.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 89. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | 190 µg | -92.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.51 mg | +54.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 0.47 mg | -61.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | 0.35 mg | -83.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.86 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 50 mg | +5455.6% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 123.6 mg | +484.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 37 g | +6.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | 201 mg | -36.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | 1714 µg | +2034.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 1890 mg | +967.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 63.94 g | +18.4% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 220 mg | +23.6% |
| Mangan | — | 7.87 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | 4.94 mg | -50.9% |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 814 mg | -64.3% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 9.11 g | -35.6% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 55 mg | +83.3% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 7.79 g | -3.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.73 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 274 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.81 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 7.43 g | -42.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.19 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.71 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 6.18 mg | +42.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Dağ Kekiği (Zahter).
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has less energy per 100 g (276 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acı paprika has 0.9 mg and Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has 50 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) 89.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.