Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Acı kayısı çekirdeği has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
540 vs 654(+21.1%)
Score Diff
26 vs 14(-46.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı kayısı çekirdeği
Higher energy
Beyaz ceviz
Score leader
Acı kayısı çekirdeği
Nutrient split
13 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı kayısı çekirdeği and Beyaz ceviz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı kayısı çekirdeği has 540.0 kcal and Beyaz ceviz has 654.0 kcal. The difference is 114.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı kayısı çekirdeği | Beyaz ceviz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 9.08 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.22 mg | 0.346 mg | +57.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.58 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.537 mg | +258.0% |
| Bakir | 1 mg | 1.58 mg | +58.0% |
| Demir | 4.5 mg | 2.91 mg | -35.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 8 g | 6.7 g | -16.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 4.3 mg | 0.7 mg | -83.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 654 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 500 mg | 346 mg | -30.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 230 mg | 98 mg | -57.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15 g | 13.71 g | -8.6% |
| Kül | 3 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 240 mg | 158 mg | -34.2% |
| Mangan | 1.8 mg | 3.41 mg | +89.4% |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 441 mg | -32.2% |
| Protein | 25 g | 15.23 g | -39.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 38.09 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 4.9 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 2 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 5.4 g | 4.07 g | -24.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.5 g | 6.13 g | +75.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 48 µg | 98 µg | +104.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 31.2 g | 8.93 g | -71.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 47 g | 65.21 g | +38.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 11.1 g | 47.17 g | +325.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.61 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 3.09 mg | -24.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı kayısı çekirdeği and Beyaz ceviz.
Acı kayısı çekirdeği has less energy per 100 g (540 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Acı kayısı çekirdeği has 11.1 g and Beyaz ceviz has 47.17 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı kayısı çekirdeği 26, Beyaz ceviz 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.