Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
45 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Wakame yosunu has a higher nutrition quality score (50) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 45(-87.9%)
Score Diff
43 vs 50(+16.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Wakame yosunu
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Wakame yosunu
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Wakame yosunu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Wakame yosunu has 45.0 kcal. The difference is 328.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Wakame yosunu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | 18 µg | -82.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.06 mg | -76.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 0.23 mg | -42.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.28 mg | -44.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 3 mg | +50.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 2.18 mg | -66.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 0.5 g | -97.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | 1 mg | +100.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 80 mg | -68.0% |
| İyot | — | 4200 µg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 5.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 150 mg | -57.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 9.14 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 107 mg | -61.8% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | 1.4 mg | -6.7% |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 1.6 mg | -46.7% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 50 mg | -96.0% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 3.03 g | -76.4% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 872 mg | +4260.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 80 g | +900.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 196 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 0.64 g | -94.8% |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 0.38 mg | -84.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Wakame yosunu.
Wakame yosunu has less energy per 100 g (45 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Achiote has 20 mg and Wakame yosunu has 872 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Wakame yosunu 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.