Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
295 kcal
Score
95 / 100
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 295(-20.9%)
Score Diff
43 vs 95(+120.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu)
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu)
Nutrient split
3 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has 295.0 kcal. The difference is 78.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 95. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 4200 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | 210 µg | +110.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.251 mg | +0.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 1.339 mg | +234.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 2.41 mg | +588.6% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 50 mg | +2400.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 32.3 mg | +396.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 7.4 g | -55.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 313 mg | +25.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 1139 mg | +220.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 50.22 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | 12.03 g | +85.6% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 347 mg | +23.9% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | 7.97 mg | +431.3% |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 8.95 mg | +198.3% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 3020 mg | +141.6% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 22.77 g | +77.1% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 62 mg | +210.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 7.74 g | -3.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 274 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 7.24 g | -41.4% |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 3.9 mg | +56.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Tarragon (Tarhun Otu).
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has less energy per 100 g (295 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Achiote has 2 mg and Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has 50 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) 95.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.