Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
253 kcal
Score
96 / 100
Kuru dereotu has a higher nutrition quality score (96) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 253(-32.2%)
Score Diff
43 vs 96(+123.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru dereotu
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Kuru dereotu
Nutrient split
8 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Kuru dereotu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Kuru dereotu has 253.0 kcal. The difference is 120.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 96. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Kuru dereotu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | 293 µg | +193.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.42 mg | +68.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 0.28 mg | -30.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.63 mg | +80.0% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.14 mg | -72.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 50 mg | +2400.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 48.78 mg | +650.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 13.6 g | -17.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | 274 µg | +128.3% |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 543 mg | +117.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 1784 mg | +402.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 55.82 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | 12.55 g | +93.7% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 256 mg | -8.6% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | 1.26 mg | -16.0% |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 2.81 mg | -6.3% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 3308 mg | +164.6% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 19.96 g | +55.2% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 208 mg | +940.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 7.3 g | -8.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.24 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.87 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 4.36 g | -64.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.94 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 3.3 mg | +32.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Kuru dereotu.
Kuru dereotu has less energy per 100 g (253 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Achiote has 2 mg and Kuru dereotu has 50 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Kuru dereotu 96.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.