Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
0 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
373 vs 0
Score Diff
43 vs —
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
13 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt) has 0.0 kcal. The difference is 373.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.08 mg | -84.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | — | — |
| Bor | — | 180 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 2.4 mg | -63.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 0 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | 0 kcal | -100.0% |
| Florür | — | 85 µg | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 2.5 mg | -99.0% |
| İyot | — | 78 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 190 mg | -46.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 0 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | 92.2 g | +1322.8% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 440 mg | +57.1% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | 0.22 mg | -85.3% |
| Niasin | 3 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 115 mg | -90.8% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | 1.2 µg | -76.0% |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 33800 mg | +168900.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 7.8 g | -2.5% |
| Sulfur, S | — | 520 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 0.35 mg | -86.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt).
Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt) has less energy per 100 g (0 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Achiote has 20 mg and Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt) has 33800 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Kelt Tuzu (Celtic Sea Salt) —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.