Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
61 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
70 vs 61(-12.9%)
Score Diff
40 vs 43(+7.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Acai Berry
Score leader
Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
10 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acai Berry and Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acai Berry has 70.0 kcal and Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 61.0 kcal. The difference is 9.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acai Berry | Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.027 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.025 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.063 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.13 mg | -13.3% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 52 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9 mg | 92.7 mg | +930.0% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.31 mg | -74.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 3 g | -14.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.5 mg | 1.46 mg | -2.7% |
| Fosfor | — | 34 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 40.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 34 mg | -2.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4 g | 14.66 g | +266.5% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 122 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 17 mg | -15.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.7 g | — | — |
| Potasyum | 130 mg | 312 mg | +140.0% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.14 g | -5.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | — | — |
| Su | 85 g | 83.07 g | -2.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 25 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5 g | 0.52 g | -89.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | 8.99 g | +1698.0% |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.14 mg | -53.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acai Berry and Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Acai Berry has 0.5 g and Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 8.99 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acai Berry 40, Kivi (Organik/Köy Usulü) 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.