Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
63 kcal
Score
60 / 100
Kara kuş üzümü has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
70 vs 63(-10.0%)
Score Diff
40 vs 60(+50.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kara kuş üzümü
Higher energy
Acai Berry
Score leader
Kara kuş üzümü
Nutrient split
7 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acai Berry and Kara kuş üzümü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acai Berry has 70.0 kcal and Kara kuş üzümü has 63.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acai Berry | Kara kuş üzümü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | 12 µg | -81.5% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.066 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.086 mg | -42.7% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 140 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9 mg | 181 mg | +1911.1% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.54 mg | +28.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 6.8 g | +94.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.5 mg | 1 mg | -33.3% |
| Folat DFE | — | 8 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 59 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 55 mg | +57.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4 g | 15.38 g | +284.5% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | 0.85 g | +6.2% |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 24 mg | +20.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.256 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.7 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.3 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.398 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 130 mg | 322 mg | +147.7% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.4 g | +16.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 2 mg | -71.4% |
| Su | 85 g | 81.96 g | -3.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5 g | 0.41 g | -91.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | 7.37 g | +1374.0% |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.27 mg | -10.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acai Berry and Kara kuş üzümü.
Kara kuş üzümü has less energy per 100 g (63 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acai Berry has 9 mg and Kara kuş üzümü has 181 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acai Berry 40, Kara kuş üzümü 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.