Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
41.1 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
70 vs 41.1(-41.3%)
Score Diff
40 vs 52(+30.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Acai Berry
Score leader
Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
11 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acai Berry and Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acai Berry has 70.0 kcal and Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 41.1 kcal. The difference is 28.9 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acai Berry | Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | 4 µg | -93.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.08 mg | -46.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9 mg | 45 mg | +400.0% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.6 mg | -50.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 2.1 g | -40.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.5 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | — | 18 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 26 mg | -25.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4 g | 9.2 g | +130.0% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | 0.5 g | -37.5% |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 12 mg | -40.0% |
| Malik asit | — | 1800 mg | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.7 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 130 mg | 240 mg | +84.6% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.4 g | -66.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Sitrik asit | — | 120 mg | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 2 mg | -71.4% |
| Su | 85 g | 87.5 g | +2.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5 g | 0.3 g | -94.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | 4.8 g | +860.0% |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.15 mg | -50.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acai Berry and Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (41.1 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Acai Berry has 0.5 g and Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 4.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acai Berry 40, Gilaburu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.