Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
56 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Frenk Üzümü has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
70 vs 56(-20.0%)
Score Diff
40 vs 52(+30.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Frenk Üzümü
Higher energy
Acai Berry
Score leader
Frenk Üzümü
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acai Berry and Frenk Üzümü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acai Berry has 70.0 kcal and Frenk Üzümü has 56.0 kcal. The difference is 14.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acai Berry | Frenk Üzümü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | 2 µg | -96.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.107 mg | -28.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9 mg | 41 mg | +355.6% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1 mg | -16.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 4.3 g | +22.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.5 mg | 0.1 mg | -93.3% |
| Fosfor | — | 44 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 11 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 33 mg | -5.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4 g | 13.8 g | +245.0% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | 0.66 g | -17.5% |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 13 mg | -35.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.186 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.7 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 130 mg | 275 mg | +111.5% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.4 g | +16.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 1 mg | -85.7% |
| Su | 85 g | 83.95 g | -1.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 0.034 g | -97.4% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 8 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5 g | 0.2 g | -96.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | 7.37 g | +1374.0% |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.23 mg | -23.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acai Berry and Frenk Üzümü.
Frenk Üzümü has less energy per 100 g (56 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Acai Berry has 0.5 g and Frenk Üzümü has 7.37 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acai Berry 40, Frenk Üzümü 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.