Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
298 kcal
Score
9 / 100
A2 sütü has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
61 vs 298(+388.5%)
Score Diff
34 vs 9(-73.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
A2 sütü
Higher energy
Yoğurt kaymağı
Score leader
A2 sütü
Nutrient split
9 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
A2 sütü and Yoğurt kaymağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, A2 sütü has 61.0 kcal and Yoğurt kaymağı has 298.0 kcal. The difference is 237.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 34 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | A2 sütü | Yoğurt kaymağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 295 µg | +953.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.45 µg | 0.28 µg | -37.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.14 mg | -22.2% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.65 µg | — |
| Demir | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Fosfor | 84 mg | 92 mg | +9.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 113 mg | 115 mg | +1.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.65 g | 3.8 g | -18.3% |
| Kolesterol | 10 mg | 88 mg | +780.0% |
| Kül | 0.72 g | 0.8 g | +11.1% |
| Laktoz | 4.81 g | 3.8 g | -21.0% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 9.5 mg | -5.0% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 128 mg | -3.0% |
| Protein | 3.28 g | 3.2 g | -2.4% |
| Retinol | — | 280 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 40 mg | 42 mg | +5.0% |
| Su | 88.13 g | 62.2 g | -29.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.86 g | 18.8 g | +910.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.81 g | 7.9 g | +875.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.25 g | 30 g | +823.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 1.1 g | +816.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.81 g | 3.8 g | -21.0% |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 0.42 mg | +10.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between A2 sütü and Yoğurt kaymağı.
A2 sütü has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 298 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), A2 sütü has 28 µg and Yoğurt kaymağı has 295 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: A2 sütü 34, Yoğurt kaymağı 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.