Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
115 kcal
Score
23 / 100
A2 sütü has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
61 vs 115(+88.5%)
Score Diff
34 vs 23(-32.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
A2 sütü
Higher energy
Sütlü irmik
Score leader
A2 sütü
Nutrient split
12 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
A2 sütü and Sütlü irmik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, A2 sütü has 61.0 kcal and Sütlü irmik has 115.0 kcal. The difference is 54.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 34 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | A2 sütü | Sütlü irmik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 40 µg | +42.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.45 µg | 0.35 µg | -22.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.15 mg | -16.7% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.5 µg | — |
| Demir | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.5 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 115 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 4 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 84 mg | 75 mg | -10.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 113 mg | 100 mg | -11.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.65 g | 18.5 g | +297.8% |
| Kolesterol | 10 mg | 9 mg | -10.0% |
| Kül | 0.72 g | — | — |
| Laktoz | 4.81 g | 4 g | -16.8% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 8 mg | -20.0% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 125 mg | -5.3% |
| Protein | 3.28 g | 3.8 g | +15.9% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 8.3 g | — |
| Sodyum | 40 mg | 40 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 88.13 g | 74.5 g | -15.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.86 g | 2 g | +7.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.81 g | 0.8 g | -1.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.25 g | 3 g | -7.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 0.2 g | +66.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.81 g | 12.5 g | +159.9% |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 0.3 mg | -21.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between A2 sütü and Sütlü irmik.
A2 sütü has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 115 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), A2 sütü has 4.65 g and Sütlü irmik has 18.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: A2 sütü 34, Sütlü irmik 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.