Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
103.1 kcal
Score
24 / 100
A2 sütü has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
61 vs 103.1(+69.0%)
Score Diff
34 vs 24(-29.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
A2 sütü
Higher energy
Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
A2 sütü
Nutrient split
4 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
A2 sütü and Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, A2 sütü has 61.0 kcal and Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 103.1 kcal. The difference is 42.1 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 34 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | A2 sütü | Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 53 µg | +89.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.45 µg | 0.36 µg | -20.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.14 mg | -22.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 103.1 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 84 mg | 130 mg | +54.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 113 mg | 169 mg | +49.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.65 g | 4.9 g | +5.4% |
| Kolesterol | 10 mg | 19 mg | +90.0% |
| Kül | 0.72 g | 0.8 g | +11.1% |
| Laktoz | 4.81 g | 4.9 g | +1.9% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 18 mg | +80.0% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 178 mg | +34.8% |
| Protein | 3.28 g | 4 g | +22.0% |
| Retinol | — | 53 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 40 mg | 52 mg | +30.0% |
| Su | 88.13 g | 82.8 g | -6.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.86 g | 4.6 g | +147.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.81 g | 2.1 g | +159.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.25 g | 7.5 g | +130.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 0.2 g | +66.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.81 g | 4.9 g | +1.9% |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 0.22 mg | -42.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between A2 sütü and Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü).
A2 sütü has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 103.1 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, A2 sütü has 0.81 g and Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 2.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: A2 sütü 34, Manda Sütü (Organik/Köy Usulü) 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.