Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
181 kcal
Score
34 / 100
Adobo, Pilavlı has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
137 vs 181(+32.1%)
Score Diff
25 vs 34(+36.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adobo, Pilavlı
Higher energy
Adobo, Pilavlı
Score leader
Adobo, Pilavlı
Nutrient split
22 - 29 (tie: 14)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tavuk Mole Soslu and Adobo, Pilavlı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tavuk Mole Soslu has 137.0 kcal and Adobo, Pilavlı has 181.0 kcal. The difference is 44.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 25 and 34. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tavuk Mole Soslu | Adobo, Pilavlı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 16 µg | 4 µg | -75.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 20 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.24 mg | +300.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.25 µg | 0.44 µg | +76.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.14 mg | 0.21 mg | +50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.19 mg | 0.25 mg | +31.6% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.1 mg | +42.9% |
| Besin folati | 7 µg | 4 µg | -42.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 97 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 17 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.1 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.4 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.78 mg | 1.34 mg | +71.8% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.48 mg | 0.21 mg | -56.3% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 137 kj | 181 kj | +32.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 33 µg | +371.4% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 17 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 172 mg | 161 mg | -6.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.9 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Kafein | 2 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 13 mg | 18 mg | +38.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.22 g | 8.86 g | +175.2% |
| Kolesterol | 78 mg | 75 mg | -3.8% |
| Likopen | 267 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 28 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 21 mg | 0.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.32 g | 0.37 g | +15.6% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.87 g | 3.2 g | +71.1% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.04 g | +300.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 5.42 mg | 3.59 mg | -33.8% |
| Potasyum | 232 mg | 216 mg | -6.9% |
| Protein | 18.97 g | 17.69 g | -6.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.69 g | 0.91 g | +31.9% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.05 g | 0.05 g | 0.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.04 g | +300.0% |
| Retinol | 6 µg | 4 µg | -33.3% |
| Selenyum | 16.9 µg | 24.6 µg | +45.6% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0.07 g | +250.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.12 g | 1.75 g | +56.2% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.5 g | 0.72 g | +44.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 542 mg | 522 mg | -3.7% |
| Su | 70.73 g | 63.34 g | -10.4% |
| Teobromin | 15 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.66 g | 2.58 g | +55.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | 21 µg | +162.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 47.1 mg | 59.2 mg | +25.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.2 g | 3.61 g | +64.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.58 g | 7.94 g | +42.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.76 g | 1.02 g | +34.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.12 g | 0.03 g | -98.6% |
| Çinko | 1.19 mg | 2.54 mg | +113.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tavuk Mole Soslu and Adobo, Pilavlı.
Tavuk Mole Soslu has less energy per 100 g (137 kcal versus 181 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Tavuk Mole Soslu has 7 µg and Adobo, Pilavlı has 33 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tavuk Mole Soslu 25, Adobo, Pilavlı 34.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.