Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
105 vs 263(+150.5%)
Score Diff
29 vs 6(-79.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu
Nutrient split
14 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu has 105.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 158.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 68 µg | 2 µg | -97.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.28 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 816 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 28.5 mg | 8 mg | -71.9% |
| Demir | 0.85 mg | 0.4 mg | -52.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 1.1 g | -38.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.45 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 42 mg | 9 mg | -78.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 15 mg | -37.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 22 g | 68 g | +209.1% |
| Kül | 5.45 g | 0.3 g | -94.5% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 6 mg | -66.7% |
| Mangan | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.25 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 375 mg | 77 mg | -79.5% |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 0.4 g | -81.0% |
| Sodyum | 2040 mg | 12 mg | -99.4% |
| Su | 69.5 g | 30.2 g | -56.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.95 g | 0.1 g | -89.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 18.2 g | 60.3 g | +231.3% |
| Çinko | 0.35 mg | 0.08 mg | -77.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu and Ahududu reçeli.
Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu has less energy per 100 g (105 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu has 18.2 g and Ahududu reçeli has 60.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sriracha Acı Biber Sosu 29, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.