Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
138 kcal
Score
16 / 100
Hiyashi chuka has a higher nutrition quality score (16) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
305 vs 138(-54.8%)
Score Diff
11 vs 16(+45.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hiyashi chuka
Higher energy
Pandesal
Score leader
Hiyashi chuka
Nutrient split
16 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pandesal and Hiyashi chuka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pandesal has 305.0 kcal and Hiyashi chuka has 138.0 kcal. The difference is 167.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 16. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pandesal | Hiyashi chuka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 32 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.38 mg | 0.11 mg | -71.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.08 mg | -66.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 3.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.9 mg | 0.95 mg | -67.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 1.3 g | -43.5% |
| Folat DFE | 98 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 92 mg | 68 mg | -26.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 68 mg | 22 mg | -67.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 56.5 g | 20.4 g | -63.9% |
| Kolesterol | — | 21 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.6 g | 1.2 g | -25.0% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 16 mg | -23.8% |
| Niasin | 3.25 mg | 1.25 mg | -61.5% |
| Potasyum | 118 mg | 165 mg | +39.8% |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 5.2 g | -39.5% |
| Sodyum | 435 mg | 470 mg | +8.0% |
| Su | 28.5 g | 69.8 g | +144.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.5 g | 0.65 g | -56.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | 1.25 g | -30.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.8 g | 3.4 g | -29.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 1.22 g | +10.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 11.4 g | 3.1 g | -72.8% |
| Çinko | 0.72 mg | 0.58 mg | -19.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pandesal and Hiyashi chuka.
Hiyashi chuka has less energy per 100 g (138 kcal versus 305 kcal).
For measured Su, Pandesal has 28.5 g and Hiyashi chuka has 69.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pandesal 11, Hiyashi chuka 16.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.