Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
224 kcal
Score
13 / 100
Goubuli has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
305 vs 224(-26.6%)
Score Diff
11 vs 13(+18.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Goubuli
Higher energy
Pandesal
Score leader
Goubuli
Nutrient split
10 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pandesal and Goubuli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pandesal has 305.0 kcal and Goubuli has 224.0 kcal. The difference is 81.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 13. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pandesal | Goubuli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.38 mg | 0.21 mg | -44.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.1 mg | -58.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.9 mg | 1.45 mg | -50.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 1.4 g | -39.1% |
| Folat DFE | 98 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 92 mg | 105 mg | +14.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 68 mg | 24 mg | -64.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 56.5 g | 27.5 g | -51.3% |
| Kolesterol | — | 24 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.6 g | 1.7 g | +6.2% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 18 mg | -14.3% |
| Niasin | 3.25 mg | 2.35 mg | -27.7% |
| Potasyum | 118 mg | 168 mg | +42.4% |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 8.9 g | +3.5% |
| Selenyum | — | 14.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 435 mg | 415 mg | -4.6% |
| Su | 28.5 g | 52.8 g | +85.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.5 g | 3.1 g | +106.7% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 32 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | 4.1 g | +127.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.8 g | 9.1 g | +89.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 1.3 g | +18.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 11.4 g | 2.1 g | -81.6% |
| Çinko | 0.72 mg | 1.25 mg | +73.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pandesal and Goubuli.
Goubuli has less energy per 100 g (224 kcal versus 305 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Pandesal has 1.8 g and Goubuli has 4.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pandesal 11, Goubuli 13.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.