Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
88 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Mlokhiyeh has a higher nutrition quality score (86) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
48 vs 88(+83.3%)
Score Diff
86 vs 52(-39.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mlokhiyeh
Higher energy
Hongeohoe
Score leader
Mlokhiyeh
Nutrient split
11 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mlokhiyeh and Hongeohoe are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mlokhiyeh has 48.0 kcal and Hongeohoe has 88.0 kcal. The difference is 40.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 86 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mlokhiyeh | Hongeohoe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 245 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.04 mg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 2.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.13 mg | 0.13 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.26 mg | +73.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 2940 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 19.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.6 mg | 0.9 mg | -65.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji | 201 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 48 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 49 mg | 215 mg | +338.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 96 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 172 mg | 65 mg | -62.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 54 mg | — |
| Kül | — | 2.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 28 mg | -48.1% |
| Niasin | 1.25 mg | 3.4 mg | +172.0% |
| Potasyum | 315 mg | 320 mg | +1.6% |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 20.2 g | +551.6% |
| Selenyum | — | 36.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 280 mg | 490 mg | +75.0% |
| Su | 88.4 g | 76.8 g | -13.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 0.21 g | -53.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.18 g | -85.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.2 g | 0.8 g | -63.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | 0.27 g | -32.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 1.15 mg | +98.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mlokhiyeh and Hongeohoe.
Mlokhiyeh has less energy per 100 g (48 kcal versus 88 kcal).
For measured Protein, Mlokhiyeh has 3.1 g and Hongeohoe has 20.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mlokhiyeh 86, Hongeohoe 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.