Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
171.7 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Couscous osban has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
132 vs 171.7(+30.1%)
Score Diff
30 vs 46(+53.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Couscous osban
Higher energy
Couscous osban
Score leader
Couscous osban
Nutrient split
4 - 18 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mi quang and Couscous osban are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mi quang has 132.0 kcal and Couscous osban has 171.7 kcal. The difference is 39.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mi quang | Couscous osban | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 26 µg | 142 µg | +446.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.32 µg | 1.45 µg | +353.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 145 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | 4.5 mg | +7.1% |
| Demir | 1.15 mg | 2.1 mg | +82.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 1.8 g | +50.0% |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 86 mg | 110 mg | +27.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 34 mg | 28 mg | -17.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.5 g | 20.5 g | +24.2% |
| Kolesterol | 24 mg | 45 mg | +87.5% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.3 g | +8.3% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| Niasin | 1.85 mg | 2.3 mg | +24.3% |
| Potasyum | 168 mg | 240 mg | +42.9% |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 7.8 g | +21.9% |
| Sodyum | 385 mg | 380 mg | -1.3% |
| Su | 74.2 g | 62.1 g | -16.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.25 g | 2.3 g | +84.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 36 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.82 g | 2.6 g | +42.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.5 g | 6.5 g | +44.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.12 g | 0.8 g | -28.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.1 g | 1.2 g | +9.1% |
| Çinko | 0.82 mg | 1.6 mg | +95.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mi quang and Couscous osban.
Mi quang has less energy per 100 g (132 kcal versus 171.7 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Mi quang has 26 µg and Couscous osban has 142 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mi quang 30, Couscous osban 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.