Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
171.7 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Couscous osban has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
148 vs 171.7(+16.0%)
Score Diff
30 vs 46(+53.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Couscous osban
Higher energy
Couscous osban
Score leader
Couscous osban
Nutrient split
12 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Laing and Couscous osban are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Laing has 148.0 kcal and Couscous osban has 171.7 kcal. The difference is 23.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Laing | Couscous osban | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 185 µg | 142 µg | -23.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 2180 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.4 mg | 4.5 mg | -60.5% |
| Demir | 1.6 mg | 2.1 mg | +31.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 1.8 g | -35.7% |
| Folat DFE | 42 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 45 mg | 110 mg | +144.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 84 mg | 28 mg | -66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.5 g | 20.5 g | +215.4% |
| Kolesterol | — | 45 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.4 g | 1.3 g | -7.1% |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 24 mg | -29.4% |
| Niasin | 1.15 mg | 2.3 mg | +100.0% |
| Potasyum | 310 mg | 240 mg | -22.6% |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 7.8 g | +151.6% |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 380 mg | -9.5% |
| Su | 74.8 g | 62.1 g | -17.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 9.8 g | 2.3 g | -76.5% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 36 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.9 g | 2.6 g | +188.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.2 g | 6.5 g | -46.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | 0.8 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.7 g | 1.2 g | -29.4% |
| Çinko | 0.72 mg | 1.6 mg | +122.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Laing and Couscous osban.
Laing has less energy per 100 g (148 kcal versus 171.7 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Laing has 6.5 g and Couscous osban has 20.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Laing 30, Couscous osban 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.