Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
238 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Kesra has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
293.2 vs 238(-18.8%)
Score Diff
12 vs 10(-16.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kesra
Higher energy
Kesra
Score leader
Kesra
Nutrient split
16 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kesra and Qingtuan are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kesra has 293.2 kcal and Qingtuan has 238.0 kcal. The difference is 55.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 12 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kesra | Qingtuan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.22 mg | 0.08 mg | -63.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.05 mg | -44.4% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 115 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 1.4 mg | -33.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 2.8 g | -12.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.15 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 238 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 42 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 62 mg | -46.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 24 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.3 g | 50.4 g | +2.2% |
| Kül | 1.7 g | 0.8 g | -52.9% |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 22 mg | -42.1% |
| Niasin | 2.4 mg | 0.95 mg | -60.4% |
| Potasyum | 165 mg | 145 mg | -12.1% |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 4.1 g | -47.4% |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 28 mg | -93.3% |
| Su | 34.2 g | 42.5 g | +24.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 0.45 g | -59.1% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 26 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 0.85 g | -81.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.2 g | 2.2 g | -69.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.72 g | -40.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.1 g | 19.5 g | +1672.7% |
| Çinko | 1.05 mg | 0.75 mg | -28.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kesra and Qingtuan.
Qingtuan has less energy per 100 g (238 kcal versus 293.2 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Kesra has 1.1 g and Qingtuan has 19.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kesra 12, Qingtuan 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Kesra · Qingtuan · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.