Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
88 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Hongeohoe has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
293.2 vs 88(-70.0%)
Score Diff
12 vs 52(+333.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hongeohoe
Higher energy
Kesra
Score leader
Hongeohoe
Nutrient split
9 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kesra and Hongeohoe are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kesra has 293.2 kcal and Hongeohoe has 88.0 kcal. The difference is 205.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 12 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kesra | Hongeohoe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.22 mg | 0.04 mg | -81.8% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 2.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.13 mg | +44.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.26 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 0.9 mg | -57.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.15 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 42 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 215 mg | +87.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 65 mg | +170.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 54 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.7 g | 2.2 g | +29.4% |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 28 mg | -26.3% |
| Niasin | 2.4 mg | 3.4 mg | +41.7% |
| Potasyum | 165 mg | 320 mg | +93.9% |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 20.2 g | +159.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 36.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 490 mg | +16.7% |
| Su | 34.2 g | 76.8 g | +124.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 0.21 g | -80.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 0.18 g | -96.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.2 g | 0.8 g | -88.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.27 g | -77.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.05 mg | 1.15 mg | +9.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kesra and Hongeohoe.
Hongeohoe has less energy per 100 g (88 kcal versus 293.2 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Kesra has 24 mg and Hongeohoe has 65 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kesra 12, Hongeohoe 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.