Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
137 kcal
Score
56 / 100
Chou doufu has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
168 vs 137(-18.4%)
Score Diff
37 vs 56(+51.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Chou doufu
Higher energy
Jaew bong
Score leader
Chou doufu
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Jaew bong and Chou doufu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Jaew bong has 168.0 kcal and Chou doufu has 137.0 kcal. The difference is 31.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 37 and 56. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Jaew bong | Chou doufu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 285 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.65 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.16 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.11 mg | -73.8% |
| Bakir | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 3200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 24.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.6 mg | 2.85 mg | +9.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.8 g | 1.8 g | -69.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.1 mg | 0.85 mg | -59.5% |
| Fosfor | 110 mg | 145 mg | +31.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 95 mg | 215 mg | +126.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.5 g | 3.8 g | -86.2% |
| Kül | 6.9 g | 2 g | -71.0% |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 64 mg | +68.4% |
| Mangan | — | 0.72 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.95 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 460 mg | 180 mg | -60.9% |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 12.2 g | +64.9% |
| Selenyum | — | 9.6 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 2150 mg | 485 mg | -77.4% |
| Su | 54.2 g | 72.1 g | +33.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.8 g | 1.25 g | +56.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 32 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 1.82 g | +65.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.2 g | 8.1 g | +153.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.9 g | 4.35 g | +383.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 17.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 1.45 mg | +31.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Jaew bong and Chou doufu.
Chou doufu has less energy per 100 g (137 kcal versus 168 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Jaew bong has 0.9 g and Chou doufu has 4.35 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Jaew bong 37, Chou doufu 56.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.