Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
305 kcal
Score
11 / 100
Hiyashi chuka has a higher nutrition quality score (16) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
138 vs 305(+121.0%)
Score Diff
16 vs 11(-31.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hiyashi chuka
Higher energy
Pandesal
Score leader
Hiyashi chuka
Nutrient split
4 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hiyashi chuka and Pandesal are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hiyashi chuka has 138.0 kcal and Pandesal has 305.0 kcal. The difference is 167.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 16 and 11. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hiyashi chuka | Pandesal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 32 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.38 mg | +245.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.24 mg | +200.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.95 mg | 2.9 mg | +205.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.3 g | 2.3 g | +76.9% |
| Folat DFE | — | 98 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 68 mg | 92 mg | +35.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 68 mg | +209.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20.4 g | 56.5 g | +177.0% |
| Kolesterol | 21 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.6 g | +33.3% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 21 mg | +31.3% |
| Niasin | 1.25 mg | 3.25 mg | +160.0% |
| Potasyum | 165 mg | 118 mg | -28.5% |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 8.6 g | +65.4% |
| Sodyum | 470 mg | 435 mg | -7.4% |
| Su | 69.8 g | 28.5 g | -59.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.65 g | 1.5 g | +130.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.25 g | 1.8 g | +44.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.4 g | 4.8 g | +41.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.22 g | 1.1 g | -9.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.1 g | 11.4 g | +267.7% |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 0.72 mg | +24.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hiyashi chuka and Pandesal.
Hiyashi chuka has less energy per 100 g (138 kcal versus 305 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Hiyashi chuka has 3.1 g and Pandesal has 11.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hiyashi chuka 16, Pandesal 11.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.