Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
98 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Hake balığı has a higher nutrition quality score (53) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
78 vs 98(+25.6%)
Score Diff
53 vs 50(-5.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hake balığı
Higher energy
Balık kıkırdağı
Score leader
Hake balığı
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hake balığı and Balık kıkırdağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hake balığı has 78.0 kcal and Balık kıkırdağı has 98.0 kcal. The difference is 20.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hake balığı | Balık kıkırdağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B12 Vitamini | 1.1 µg | 0.9 µg | -18.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.16 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.9 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 0.8 mg | +100.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.23 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 194 mg | 580 mg | +199.0% |
| Glisin | — | 4.1 g | — |
| Hidroksiprolin | — | 1.9 g | — |
| İyot | 45 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 1150 mg | +4007.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 67 mg | 32 mg | -52.2% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 3.7 g | +208.3% |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 42 mg | +75.0% |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 299 mg | 85 mg | -71.6% |
| Prolin | — | 2.6 g | — |
| Protein | 17.2 g | 19.8 g | +15.1% |
| Selenyum | 32.1 µg | 18.5 µg | -42.4% |
| Sodyum | 72 mg | 145 mg | +101.4% |
| Su | 80.3 g | 74.2 g | -7.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.28 g | 0.35 g | +25.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.23 g | 0.32 g | +39.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.3 g | 1.2 g | -7.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.44 g | 0.41 g | -6.8% |
| Çinko | 0.46 mg | 1.4 mg | +204.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hake balığı and Balık kıkırdağı.
Hake balığı has less energy per 100 g (78 kcal versus 98 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Hake balığı has 28 mg and Balık kıkırdağı has 1150 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hake balığı 53, Balık kıkırdağı 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.