Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
218 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Gyeran jjim has a higher nutrition quality score (53) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
78.5 vs 218(+177.7%)
Score Diff
53 vs 20(-62.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Gyeran jjim
Higher energy
Zhong dumplings
Score leader
Gyeran jjim
Nutrient split
7 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Gyeran jjim and Zhong dumplings are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Gyeran jjim has 78.5 kcal and Zhong dumplings has 218.0 kcal. The difference is 139.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Gyeran jjim | Zhong dumplings | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 92 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.24 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.52 µg | 0.45 µg | -13.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.26 mg | 0.12 mg | -53.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 1.15 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.05 mg | 1.4 mg | +33.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.15 g | 1.2 g | +700.0% |
| Enerji | — | 912 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 218 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 112 mg | 110 mg | -1.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 42 mg | 22 mg | -47.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.95 g | 25.5 g | +2584.2% |
| Kolesterol | 198 mg | 26 mg | -86.9% |
| Kül | 1.48 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 9.4 mg | 16 mg | +70.2% |
| Niasin | — | 2.2 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 128 mg | 160 mg | +25.0% |
| Protein | 7.15 g | 8.9 g | +24.5% |
| Selenyum | 17.5 µg | 12.5 µg | -28.6% |
| Sodyum | 435 mg | 680 mg | +56.3% |
| Su | 85.3 g | 55.4 g | -35.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.62 g | 2.8 g | +72.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 28.5 µg | 32 µg | +12.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 142 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.98 g | 3.7 g | +86.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.12 g | 8.8 g | +71.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.88 g | 1.8 g | +104.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 5.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.78 mg | 1.1 mg | +41.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Gyeran jjim and Zhong dumplings.
Gyeran jjim has less energy per 100 g (78.5 kcal versus 218 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Gyeran jjim has 0.95 g and Zhong dumplings has 25.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Gyeran jjim 53, Zhong dumplings 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.