Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
98 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Balık kıkırdağı has a higher nutrition quality score (50) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
92 vs 98(+6.5%)
Score Diff
48 vs 50(+4.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Balık kıkırdağı
Higher energy
Balık kıkırdağı
Score leader
Balık kıkırdağı
Nutrient split
5 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Grouper balığı and Balık kıkırdağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Grouper balığı has 92.0 kcal and Balık kıkırdağı has 98.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 48 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Grouper balığı | Balık kıkırdağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 49 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.69 µg | 0.9 µg | +30.4% |
| Demir | 0.87 mg | 0.8 mg | -8.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 143 mg | 580 mg | +305.6% |
| Glisin | — | 4.1 g | — |
| Hidroksiprolin | — | 1.9 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 21 mg | 1150 mg | +5376.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 37 mg | 32 mg | -13.5% |
| Kül | 1.12 g | 3.7 g | +230.4% |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 42 mg | +40.0% |
| Niasin | 1.33 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 400 mg | 85 mg | -78.8% |
| Prolin | — | 2.6 g | — |
| Protein | 19.38 g | 19.8 g | +2.2% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 18.5 µg | -49.3% |
| Sodyum | 53 mg | 145 mg | +173.6% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 74.2 g | -5.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.23 g | 0.35 g | +52.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.02 g | 1.2 g | +17.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.41 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.51 mg | 1.4 mg | +174.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Grouper balığı and Balık kıkırdağı.
Grouper balığı has less energy per 100 g (92 kcal versus 98 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Grouper balığı has 21 mg and Balık kıkırdağı has 1150 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Grouper balığı 48, Balık kıkırdağı 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.