Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
165.4 kcal
Score
53 / 100
Pares has a higher nutrition quality score (53) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
224 vs 165.4(-26.2%)
Score Diff
13 vs 53(+307.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pares
Higher energy
Goubuli
Score leader
Pares
Nutrient split
7 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Goubuli and Pares are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Goubuli has 224.0 kcal and Pares has 165.4 kcal. The difference is 58.6 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 53. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Goubuli | Pares | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.4 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 0.25 mg | +108.3% |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 2.1 mg | +44.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.4 g | 0.4 g | -71.4% |
| Fosfor | 105 mg | 165 mg | +57.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 18 mg | -25.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.5 g | 5.4 g | -80.4% |
| Kolesterol | 24 mg | 48 mg | +100.0% |
| Kül | 1.7 g | 1.9 g | +11.8% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 17 mg | -5.6% |
| Niasin | 2.35 mg | 3.2 mg | +36.2% |
| Potasyum | 168 mg | 245 mg | +45.8% |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 16.8 g | +88.8% |
| Selenyum | 14.8 µg | 18.5 µg | +25.0% |
| Sodyum | 415 mg | 485 mg | +16.9% |
| Su | 52.8 g | 70.4 g | +33.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 3.4 g | +9.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 32 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.1 g | 3.8 g | -7.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.1 g | 8.5 g | -6.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 0.5 g | -61.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.1 g | 4.2 g | +100.0% |
| Çinko | 1.25 mg | 3.8 mg | +204.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Goubuli and Pares.
Pares has less energy per 100 g (165.4 kcal versus 224 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Goubuli has 1.25 mg and Pares has 3.8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Goubuli 13, Pares 53.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Goubuli · Pares · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.