Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
82 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Mango lassi has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
224 vs 82(-63.4%)
Score Diff
13 vs 38(+192.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mango lassi
Higher energy
Goubuli
Score leader
Mango lassi
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Goubuli and Mango lassi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Goubuli has 224.0 kcal and Mango lassi has 82.0 kcal. The difference is 142.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Goubuli | Mango lassi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 45 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | 0.03 mg | -85.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.26 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | 0.12 mg | +20.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 360 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 0.16 mg | -89.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.4 g | 0.6 g | -57.1% |
| Fosfor | 105 mg | 68 mg | -35.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 86 mg | +258.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.5 g | 14.3 g | -48.0% |
| Kolesterol | 24 mg | 5.5 mg | -77.1% |
| Kül | 1.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 12.4 mg | -31.1% |
| Niasin | 2.35 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 168 mg | 168 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 2.2 g | -75.3% |
| Selenyum | 14.8 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 415 mg | 34 mg | -91.8% |
| Su | 52.8 g | 79.2 g | +50.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 1.05 g | -66.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 32 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.1 g | 0.46 g | -88.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.1 g | 1.75 g | -80.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 0.08 g | -93.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.1 g | 13.2 g | +528.6% |
| Çinko | 1.25 mg | 0.38 mg | -69.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Goubuli and Mango lassi.
Mango lassi has less energy per 100 g (82 kcal versus 224 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Goubuli has 2.1 g and Mango lassi has 13.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Goubuli 13, Mango lassi 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.