Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
132 kcal
Score
58 / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
161 vs 132(-18.0%)
Score Diff
— vs 58
Higher energy
Av Eti - Çiğ
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
6 - 6 (tie: 6)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Av Eti, Ayı Eti, Çiğ and Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol () are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Av Eti, Ayı Eti, Çiğ has 161.0 kcal and Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol () has 132.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Av Eti - Çiğ | Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol () | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | 0 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alanin | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Arjinin | — | 1.19 g | — |
| Aspartik asit | — | 1.76 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.12 mg | -25.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 2.67 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.68 mg | 0.23 mg | -66.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 24 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 6.65 mg | 1.74 mg | -73.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.22 mg | — |
| Enerji | 674 kj | 552 kj | -18.1% |
| Fenilalanin | — | 0.81 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 24 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 151 mg | 186 mg | +23.2% |
| Glisin | — | 0.98 g | — |
| Glutamik asit | — | 2.9 g | — |
| Histidin | — | 0.63 g | — |
| Izolosin | — | 0.96 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 3 mg | 12 mg | +300.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | — | 64 mg | — |
| Kül | 0.7 g | 1.07 g | +52.9% |
| Lizin | — | 1.77 g | — |
| Losin | — | 1.55 g | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 25 mg | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| Metiyonin | — | 0.51 g | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.16 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 1.89 g | — |
| Niasin | 3.2 mg | 6 mg | +87.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.72 mg | — |
| Potasyum | — | 287 mg | — |
| Prolin | — | 0.84 g | — |
| Protein | 20.1 g | 19.99 g | -0.5% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.36 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.07 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0.05 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 8.3 µg | 22.7 µg | +173.5% |
| Serin | — | 0.74 g | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.13 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 1.01 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.62 g | — |
| Sistin | — | 0.24 g | — |
| Sodyum | — | 69 mg | — |
| Su | 71.2 g | 74.14 g | +4.1% |
| Tirozin | — | 0.67 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.86 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 24 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.09 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.3 g | 5.2 g | -37.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.48 g | — |
| Treonin | — | 0.86 g | — |
| Triptofan | — | 0.23 g | — |
| Valin | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 4.15 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Av Eti, Ayı Eti, Çiğ and Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol ().
Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol () has less energy per 100 g (132 kcal versus 161 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Av Eti - Çiğ has 3 mg and Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol () has 12 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Av Eti - Çiğ —, Çiğ Kuzu Omuz Kol () 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.