Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
656 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi has a higher nutrition quality score (24) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
628 vs 656(+4.5%)
Score Diff
17 vs 24(+41.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi
Higher energy
Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi
Score leader
Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi
Nutrient split
9 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Fındık (Çiğ) and Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Fındık (Çiğ) has 628.0 kcal and Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi has 656.0 kcal. The difference is 28.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Fındık (Çiğ) | Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.64 mg | 0.61 mg | -4.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.56 mg | 0.1 mg | -82.1% |
| Bakir | 1.7 mg | 1.74 mg | +2.4% |
| Demir | 4.7 mg | 2.43 mg | -48.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 10 g | 7.5 g | -25.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 15 mg | 5.73 mg | -61.8% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 628 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 22 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 333 mg | 725 mg | +117.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 114 mg | 160 mg | +40.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 12.27 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 17 g | — | — |
| Kül | — | 3.51 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 163 mg | 376 mg | +130.7% |
| Mangan | — | 1.22 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 680 mg | 597 mg | -12.2% |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.32 g | -4.5% |
| Selenyum | 2.4 µg | 1917 µg | +79775.0% |
| Su | 5 g | 3.47 g | -30.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 15.14 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 45 g | 24.55 g | -45.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 60 g | 66.43 g | +10.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 8 g | 20.58 g | +157.2% |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 4.06 mg | +69.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Fındık (Çiğ) and Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi.
Fındık (Çiğ) has less energy per 100 g (628 kcal versus 656 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Fındık (Çiğ) has 2.4 µg and Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi has 1917 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Fındık (Çiğ) 17, Brezilya Cevizi Ezmesi 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.