Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
160 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Ebegümeci yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
42 vs 160(+280.9%)
Score Diff
100 vs 24(-76.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ebegümeci yaprağı
Higher energy
Yucca kökü
Score leader
Ebegümeci yaprağı
Nutrient split
15 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ebegümeci yaprağı and Yucca kökü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ebegümeci yaprağı has 42.0 kcal and Yucca kökü has 160.0 kcal. The difference is 118.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ebegümeci yaprağı | Yucca kökü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 320 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.087 mg | -27.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.048 mg | -80.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.088 mg | -51.1% |
| Bakir | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 3840 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 45 mg | 20.6 mg | -54.2% |
| Demir | 7.8 mg | 0.27 mg | -96.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.1 g | 1.8 g | -56.1% |
| Fosfor | 58 mg | 27 mg | -53.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 290 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 285 mg | 16 mg | -94.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.9 g | 38.06 g | +451.6% |
| Magnezyum | 75 mg | 21 mg | -72.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.38 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.8 mg | 0.854 mg | +6.7% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.107 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 480 mg | 271 mg | -43.5% |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 1.36 g | -67.6% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 14 mg | +16.7% |
| Su | 84.5 g | 59.68 g | -29.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 82 µg | 27 µg | -67.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.6 g | 0.28 g | -53.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.7 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.8 mg | 0.34 mg | -57.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ebegümeci yaprağı and Yucca kökü.
Ebegümeci yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (42 kcal versus 160 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Ebegümeci yaprağı has 6.9 g and Yucca kökü has 38.06 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ebegümeci yaprağı 100, Yucca kökü 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.