Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has a higher nutrition quality score (53) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
238 vs 125(-47.5%)
Score Diff
53 vs 26(-50.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et)
Higher energy
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et)
Score leader
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et)
Nutrient split
14 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) and Analı kızlı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has 238.0 kcal and Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal. The difference is 113.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) | Analı kızlı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 28 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.11 mg | +37.5% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.6 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.08 mg | -68.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.41 mg | 0.14 mg | -65.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.6 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.85 mg | 1.45 mg | -49.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 2.3 g | — |
| Fosfor | 225 mg | 78 mg | -65.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.8 g | 14.2 g | +1675.0% |
| Kolesterol | 78 mg | 12 mg | -84.6% |
| Kül | 2.5 g | 1.2 g | -52.0% |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 26 mg | +18.2% |
| Niasin | 5.8 mg | 1.65 mg | -71.6% |
| Potasyum | 345 mg | 220 mg | -36.2% |
| Protein | 25.4 g | 5.6 g | -78.0% |
| Selenyum | 28.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 520 mg | 325 mg | -37.5% |
| Su | 56.5 g | 76.2 g | +34.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.2 g | 1.75 g | -71.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 34 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 88 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | 2.15 g | -66.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 14.8 g | 5.1 g | -65.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.7 g | 0.82 g | +17.1% |
| Çinko | 5.1 mg | 1.12 mg | -78.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) and Analı kızlı.
Analı kızlı has less energy per 100 g (125 kcal versus 238 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has 0.8 g and Analı kızlı has 14.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) 53, Analı kızlı 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.