Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has a higher nutrition quality score (53) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
238 vs 294(+23.5%)
Score Diff
53 vs 20(-62.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et)
Higher energy
Acuka (Muhammara)
Score leader
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et)
Nutrient split
5 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) and Acuka (Muhammara) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has 238.0 kcal and Acuka (Muhammara) has 294.0 kcal. The difference is 56.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) | Acuka (Muhammara) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 120 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.6 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.41 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1100 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 15 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.85 mg | 1.8 mg | -36.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 3.5 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.2 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 35 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 225 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 45 mg | +150.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.8 g | 15 g | +1775.0% |
| Kolesterol | 78 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 2.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 60 mg | +172.7% |
| Niasin | 5.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 345 mg | 450 mg | +30.4% |
| Protein | 25.4 g | 4.5 g | -82.3% |
| Selenyum | 28.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 520 mg | 850 mg | +63.5% |
| Su | 56.5 g | 48 g | -15.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.2 g | 2.8 g | -54.8% |
| Toplam Kolin | 88 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | 12.5 g | +92.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 14.8 g | 24 g | +62.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.7 g | 7.5 g | +971.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.1 mg | 0.9 mg | -82.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) and Acuka (Muhammara).
Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has less energy per 100 g (238 kcal versus 294 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) has 0.8 g and Acuka (Muhammara) has 15 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Döner Eti (Yaprak Et) 53, Acuka (Muhammara) 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.