Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
292 kcal
Score
18 / 100
Guava Pasta has a higher nutrition quality score (18) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
150 vs 292(+94.7%)
Score Diff
0 vs 18(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Guava Pasta
Higher energy
Guava Pasta
Score leader
Guava Pasta
Nutrient split
27 - 23 (tie: 15)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tatlı Sos and Guava Pasta are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tatlı Sos has 150.0 kcal and Guava Pasta has 292.0 kcal. The difference is 142.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 18. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tatlı Sos | Guava Pasta | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 73 µg | 4 µg | -94.5% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0 mg | 0.01 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0 mg | 0.02 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0 mg | 0.03 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.03 mg | +200.0% |
| Besin folati | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 16 µg | 51 µg | +218.8% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 43.9 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.03 mg | 0.09 mg | +200.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0 mg | 0.16 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 150 kj | 292 kj | +94.7% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 2 mg | 3 mg | +50.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.7 µg | 0.6 µg | -14.3% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 3 mg | -40.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 19.53 g | 72.56 g | +271.5% |
| Kolesterol | 23 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 1173 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 1 mg | 2 mg | +100.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.44 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0 mg | 0.13 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 3 mg | 69 mg | +2200.0% |
| Protein | 0.09 g | 0.1 g | +11.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.22 g | 0.01 g | -95.5% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.03 g | 0.01 g | -66.7% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Retinol | 71 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 0.2 µg | 0.6 µg | +200.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.18 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.21 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.69 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.04 g | 0.01 g | -99.5% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.71 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.14 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.08 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 103 mg | 2 mg | -98.1% |
| Su | 71.98 g | 26.88 g | -62.7% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.38 g | 0.01 g | -99.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 1.8 mg | 1.2 mg | -33.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.62 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.95 g | 0.27 g | -96.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.24 g | 0.02 g | -91.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 17.15 g | 71.62 g | +317.6% |
| Çinko | 0.02 mg | 0.06 mg | +200.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tatlı Sos and Guava Pasta.
Tatlı Sos has less energy per 100 g (150 kcal versus 292 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Tatlı Sos has 3 mg and Guava Pasta has 69 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tatlı Sos 0, Guava Pasta 18.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.