Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
218 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Couscous osban has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
171.7 vs 218(+27.0%)
Score Diff
46 vs 20(-56.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Couscous osban
Higher energy
Zhong dumplings
Score leader
Couscous osban
Nutrient split
11 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Couscous osban and Zhong dumplings are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Couscous osban has 171.7 kcal and Zhong dumplings has 218.0 kcal. The difference is 46.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Couscous osban | Zhong dumplings | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 142 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.24 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.45 µg | 0.45 µg | -69.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 1.4 mg | -33.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 1.2 g | -33.3% |
| Enerji | — | 912 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 218 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 110 mg | 110 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 22 mg | -21.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20.5 g | 25.5 g | +24.4% |
| Kolesterol | 45 mg | 26 mg | -42.2% |
| Kül | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 16 mg | -33.3% |
| Niasin | 2.3 mg | 2.2 mg | -4.3% |
| Potasyum | 240 mg | 160 mg | -33.3% |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 8.9 g | +14.1% |
| Selenyum | — | 12.5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 380 mg | 680 mg | +78.9% |
| Su | 62.1 g | 55.4 g | -10.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.3 g | 2.8 g | +21.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 36 µg | 32 µg | -11.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.6 g | 3.7 g | +42.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.5 g | 8.8 g | +35.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.8 g | 1.8 g | +125.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 5.2 g | +333.3% |
| Çinko | 1.6 mg | 1.1 mg | -31.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Couscous osban and Zhong dumplings.
Couscous osban has less energy per 100 g (171.7 kcal versus 218 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Couscous osban has 1.2 g and Zhong dumplings has 5.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Couscous osban 46, Zhong dumplings 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.