Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
1 kcal
Score
91 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
60 vs 1(-98.3%)
Score Diff
35 vs 91(+160.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Congee, Yumurtalı
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
15 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Congee, Yumurtalı and Hibiskus çayı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Congee, Yumurtalı has 60.0 kcal and Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal. The difference is 59.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 91. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Congee, Yumurtalı | Hibiskus çayı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 36 µg | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.2 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.02 mg | 0.002 mg | -90.0% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 3 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 1.2 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.5 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.62 mg | 0.08 mg | -87.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 60 kj | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 37 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 13 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 47 mg | 1 mg | -97.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.1 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 8 mg | -42.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.91 g | 0.08 g | -98.8% |
| Kolesterol | 82 mg | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 101 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 3 mg | -50.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.012 mg | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.05 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.69 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.35 mg | 0.04 mg | -88.6% |
| Potasyum | 35 mg | 9 mg | -74.3% |
| Protein | 3.12 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.31 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 36 µg | — | — |
| Selenyum | 8 µg | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.48 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.16 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 213 mg | 4 mg | -98.1% |
| Su | 87.1 g | 99.58 g | +14.3% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.66 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 28 µg | 1 µg | -96.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | 67.5 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.75 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 2.06 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.38 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.05 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 0.37 mg | 0.01 mg | -97.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Congee, Yumurtalı and Hibiskus çayı.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 60 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Congee, Yumurtalı has 0.1 g and Hibiskus çayı has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Congee, Yumurtalı 35, Hibiskus çayı 91.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.