Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
160 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Çin beş baharatı has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
347 vs 160(-53.9%)
Score Diff
58 vs 24(-58.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çin beş baharatı
Higher energy
Çin beş baharatı
Score leader
Çin beş baharatı
Nutrient split
17 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çin beş baharatı and Yucca kökü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çin beş baharatı has 347.0 kcal and Yucca kökü has 160.0 kcal. The difference is 187.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çin beş baharatı | Yucca kökü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 35 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.087 mg | -51.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.26 mg | 0.048 mg | -81.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | 0.088 mg | -83.7% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 0.1 mg | -88.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 18.2 mg | 20.6 mg | +13.2% |
| Demir | 19.5 mg | 0.27 mg | -98.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 29.8 g | 1.8 g | -94.0% |
| Folat DFE | 42 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | 27 mg | -86.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 745 mg | 16 mg | -97.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.6 g | 38.06 g | -35.1% |
| Kül | 5.3 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 185 mg | 21 mg | -88.6% |
| Mangan | 9.2 mg | 0.38 mg | -95.9% |
| Niasin | 2.85 mg | 0.854 mg | -70.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.107 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1420 mg | 271 mg | -80.9% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 1.36 g | -83.4% |
| Sodyum | 52 mg | 14 mg | -73.1% |
| Su | 8.5 g | 59.68 g | +602.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 27 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.4 g | 0.28 g | -97.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.7 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 0.34 mg | -85.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çin beş baharatı and Yucca kökü.
Yucca kökü has less energy per 100 g (160 kcal versus 347 kcal).
For measured Su, Çin beş baharatı has 8.5 g and Yucca kökü has 59.68 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çin beş baharatı 58, Yucca kökü 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.