Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
160 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Beyaz pancar has a higher nutrition quality score (61) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
43 vs 160(+272.1%)
Score Diff
61 vs 24(-60.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Beyaz pancar
Higher energy
Yucca kökü
Score leader
Beyaz pancar
Nutrient split
11 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Beyaz pancar and Yucca kökü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Beyaz pancar has 43.0 kcal and Yucca kökü has 160.0 kcal. The difference is 117.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 61 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Beyaz pancar | Yucca kökü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.031 mg | 0.087 mg | +180.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.048 mg | +20.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.067 mg | 0.088 mg | +31.3% |
| Bakir | 0.075 mg | 0.1 mg | +33.3% |
| Betain | 128.7 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.9 mg | 20.6 mg | +320.4% |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 0.27 mg | -66.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 1.8 g | -35.7% |
| Folat DFE | 109 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 40 mg | 27 mg | -32.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 16 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.56 g | 38.06 g | +298.1% |
| Kül | 1.08 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 23 mg | 21 mg | -8.7% |
| Mangan | 0.326 mg | 0.38 mg | +16.6% |
| Niasin | 0.334 mg | 0.854 mg | +155.7% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.155 mg | 0.107 mg | -31.0% |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 271 mg | -16.6% |
| Protein | 1.61 g | 1.36 g | -15.5% |
| Sodyum | 78 mg | 14 mg | -82.1% |
| Su | 87.58 g | 59.68 g | -31.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.027 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 27 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.17 g | 0.28 g | +64.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.76 g | 1.7 g | -74.9% |
| Çinko | 0.35 mg | 0.34 mg | -2.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Beyaz pancar and Yucca kökü.
Beyaz pancar has less energy per 100 g (43 kcal versus 160 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Beyaz pancar has 4.9 mg and Yucca kökü has 20.6 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Beyaz pancar 61, Yucca kökü 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.