Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
262 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Bademli Tavuk has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
195 vs 262(+34.4%)
Score Diff
26 vs 14(-46.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bademli Tavuk
Higher energy
Portakal Tavuk
Score leader
Bademli Tavuk
Nutrient split
23 - 27 (tie: 15)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bademli Tavuk and Portakal Tavuk are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bademli Tavuk has 195.0 kcal and Portakal Tavuk has 262.0 kcal. The difference is 67.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bademli Tavuk | Portakal Tavuk | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 19 µg | 75 µg | +294.7% |
| Alfa Karoten | 2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.04 mg | -20.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.19 µg | 0.2 µg | +5.3% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.22 mg | +4.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.23 mg | +27.8% |
| Bakir | 0.14 mg | 0.04 mg | -71.4% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | 10 µg | -33.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 160 µg | 9 µg | -94.4% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 41 µg | 3 µg | -92.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.8 mg | 0.9 mg | -92.4% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.1 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.82 mg | 0.94 mg | +14.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 0.8 g | -33.3% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.15 mg | 1.07 mg | -66.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 195 kj | 262 kj | +34.4% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 15 µg | 10 µg | -33.3% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 166 mg | 130 mg | -21.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.7 µg | 24.4 µg | +78.1% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 36 mg | 14 mg | -61.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.46 g | 22.46 g | +403.6% |
| Kolesterol | 57 mg | 61 mg | +7.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 25 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | 81 µg | +62.0% |
| Magnezyum | 37 mg | 20 mg | -45.9% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.27 g | 0.14 g | -48.1% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.04 g | 3.28 g | -45.7% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0.04 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.34 mg | 3.59 mg | -17.3% |
| Potasyum | 243 mg | 209 mg | -14.0% |
| Protein | 15.66 g | 14.46 g | -7.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.52 g | 5.33 g | +51.4% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.24 g | 0.65 g | +170.8% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.07 g | +600.0% |
| Retinol | 4 µg | 74 µg | +1750.0% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 17.1 µg | +35.7% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0.02 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.46 g | 1.6 g | +9.6% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.38 g | 0.68 g | +78.9% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Sodyum | 330 mg | 553 mg | +67.6% |
| Su | 65.46 g | 48.43 g | -26.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.92 g | 2.42 g | +26.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 10 µg | -37.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 39.3 mg | 66.1 mg | +68.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.37 g | 3.47 g | -45.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 13.16 g | 12.68 g | -3.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.78 g | 6.09 g | +61.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.42 g | 13.6 g | +857.7% |
| Çinko | 1.14 mg | 1.13 mg | -0.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bademli Tavuk and Portakal Tavuk.
Bademli Tavuk has less energy per 100 g (195 kcal versus 262 kcal).
For measured Retinol, Bademli Tavuk has 4 µg and Portakal Tavuk has 74 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bademli Tavuk 26, Portakal Tavuk 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.