Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
88 kcal
Score
12 / 100
Sirke, Balsamic has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 88(-68.2%)
Score Diff
11 vs 12(+9.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sirke, Balsamic
Higher energy
Ashwagandha Tozu
Score leader
Sirke, Balsamic
Nutrient split
12 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ashwagandha Tozu and Sirke, Balsamic are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ashwagandha Tozu has 277.0 kcal and Sirke, Balsamic has 88.0 kcal. The difference is 189.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 12. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ashwagandha Tozu | Sirke, Balsamic | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 0 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.02 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.03 mg | -80.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 3.3 mg | 0.72 mg | -78.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 32.3 g | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 88 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 25 mg | 19 mg | -24.0% |
| Fruktoz | — | 7.38 g | — |
| Galaktoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 7.57 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 23 mg | 27 mg | +17.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 46.9 g | 17.03 g | -63.7% |
| Kül | 4.4 g | 0.37 g | -91.6% |
| Laktoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 15 mg | 12 mg | -20.0% |
| Maltoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Mangan | 0.8 mg | 0.13 mg | -83.8% |
| Niasin | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 120 mg | 112 mg | -6.7% |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 0.49 g | -86.8% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 37 mg | 23 mg | -37.8% |
| Su | 12.7 g | 76.45 g | +502.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 14.95 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.08 mg | -60.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ashwagandha Tozu and Sirke, Balsamic.
Sirke, Balsamic has less energy per 100 g (88 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured Su, Ashwagandha Tozu has 12.7 g and Sirke, Balsamic has 76.45 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ashwagandha Tozu 11, Sirke, Balsamic 12.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.