Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
18 kcal
Score
82 / 100
Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (82) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 18(-77.8%)
Score Diff
62 vs 82(+32.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
16 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 18.0 kcal. The difference is 63.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 82. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.02 mg | -92.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.02 mg | -84.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.046 mg | -72.8% |
| Bakir | — | 0.115 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 22 mg | -45.0% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 0.4 mg | -72.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 1.6 g | -71.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 23 mg | -78.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 27 mg | +8.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 4.13 g | -71.4% |
| Kül | — | 0.58 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 16 mg | -51.5% |
| Mangan | — | 0.075 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.2 mg | -90.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.138 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 227 mg | -7.0% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 0.68 g | -87.5% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 21 mg | +320.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 94.62 g | +20.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | 28 µg | -56.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.1 g | -75.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | 2.5 g | -55.9% |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.15 mg | -87.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (18 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Araka has 5 mg and Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Beyaz Turp (Organik/Köy Usulü) 82.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.