Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
239 vs 231(-3.4%)
Score Diff
46 vs 29(-37.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü)
Higher energy
Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü)
Score leader
Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü)
Nutrient split
14 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) and Lahmacun are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) has 239.0 kcal and Lahmacun has 231.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) | Lahmacun | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 45 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.3 µg | 0.6 µg | -73.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.3 mg | 0.15 mg | -50.0% |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 1.8 mg | -14.3% |
| Diyet lifi | — | 2.2 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 239 kcal | 231 kcal | -3.3% |
| Fosfor | 185 mg | 115 mg | -37.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 35 mg | +94.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.8 g | 27.4 g | +3325.0% |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | 22 mg | -69.4% |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 22 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | 5.4 mg | 2.4 mg | -55.6% |
| Potasyum | 265 mg | 210 mg | -20.8% |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 8.5 g | -48.5% |
| Selenyum | 21 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 510 mg | 420 mg | -17.6% |
| Su | 55 g | 52 g | -5.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 9.1 g | 3.5 g | -61.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 19.2 g | 9.8 g | -49.0% |
| Çinko | 4.2 mg | 1.2 mg | -71.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) and Lahmacun.
Lahmacun has less energy per 100 g (231 kcal versus 239 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) has 0.8 g and Lahmacun has 27.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adana Kebap (Restoran Usulü) 46, Lahmacun 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.