Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
64.2 kcal
Score
35 / 100
Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (35) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
61 vs 64.2(+5.3%)
Score Diff
34 vs 35(+2.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
3 - 16 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
A2 sütü and Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, A2 sütü has 61.0 kcal and Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 64.2 kcal. The difference is 3.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 34 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | A2 sütü | Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 39 µg | +39.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.046 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.45 µg | 0.46 µg | +2.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.185 mg | +2.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Fosfor | 84 mg | 95 mg | +13.1% |
| Galaktoz | — | 2.37 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 2.37 g | — |
| İyot | — | 27 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 113 mg | 122 mg | +8.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.65 g | 4.75 g | +2.2% |
| Kolesterol | 10 mg | 12 mg | +20.0% |
| Kül | 0.72 g | 0.72 g | 0.0% |
| Laktoz | 4.81 g | 0.01 g | -99.8% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 11 mg | +10.0% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 152 mg | +15.2% |
| Protein | 3.28 g | 3.32 g | +1.2% |
| Sodyum | 40 mg | 43 mg | +7.5% |
| Su | 88.13 g | 87.6 g | -0.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.86 g | 2.15 g | +15.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.81 g | 0.92 g | +13.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.25 g | 3.55 g | +9.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 0.14 g | +16.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.81 g | 4.75 g | -1.2% |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 0.41 mg | +7.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between A2 sütü and Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü).
A2 sütü has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 64.2 kcal).
For measured Laktoz, A2 sütü has 4.81 g and Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 0.01 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: A2 sütü 34, Laktozsuz Süt (Organik/Köy Usulü) 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.