Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
95 vs 125(+31.6%)
Score Diff
27 vs 26(-3.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması
Higher energy
Analı kızlı
Score leader
Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması
Nutrient split
4 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması and Analı kızlı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması has 95.0 kcal and Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal. The difference is 30.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması | Analı kızlı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 16 µg | 28 µg | +75.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.09 mg | 0.14 mg | +55.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8.4 mg | 2.6 mg | -69.0% |
| Demir | 0.68 mg | 1.45 mg | +113.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 2.3 g | +43.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 95 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 22 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 42 mg | 78 mg | +85.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 11.8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 24 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.2 g | 14.2 g | +26.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 12 mg | — |
| Kül | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 17.5 mg | 26 mg | +48.6% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.75 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.55 mg | 1.65 mg | +200.0% |
| Potasyum | 224 mg | 220 mg | -1.8% |
| Protein | 1.75 g | 5.6 g | +220.0% |
| Sodyum | 185 mg | 325 mg | +75.7% |
| Su | 80.2 g | 76.2 g | -5.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 1.75 g | +113.4% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 34 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.15 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.4 g | 5.1 g | -5.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.58 g | 0.82 g | +41.4% |
| Çinko | 0.35 mg | 1.12 mg | +220.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması and Analı kızlı.
Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması has less energy per 100 g (95 kcal versus 125 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması has 0.35 mg and Analı kızlı has 1.12 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Zeytinyağlı kabak dolması 27, Analı kızlı 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.