Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) has a higher nutrition quality score (67) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
312 vs 324.2(+3.9%)
Score Diff
67 vs 55(-17.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu)
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu)
Nutrient split
13 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) has 312.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 12.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 67 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.058 mg | 0.08 mg | +37.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | 0.09 mg | -40.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.07 mg | 0.22 mg | -79.4% |
| Bakir | 1.3 mg | 0.35 mg | -73.1% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.7 mg | 52 mg | +7328.6% |
| Demir | 55 mg | 24.5 mg | -55.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 22.7 g | 12.8 g | -43.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 4.43 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 299 mg | 75 mg | -74.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 168 mg | 180 mg | +7.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.14 g | 80.2 g | +19.5% |
| Kül | 6.02 g | 5.3 g | -12.0% |
| Magnezyum | 208 mg | 82 mg | -60.6% |
| Mangan | 19.8 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.14 mg | 1.4 mg | +22.8% |
| Potasyum | 2080 mg | 640 mg | -69.2% |
| Protein | 9.68 g | 3.2 g | -66.9% |
| Sodyum | 27 mg | 35 mg | +29.6% |
| Su | 11.43 g | 9.5 g | -16.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.84 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 20 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.25 g | 1.8 g | -44.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.76 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.21 g | 21.4 g | +566.7% |
| Çinko | 4.5 mg | 1.1 mg | -75.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) and Amchur.
Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) has less energy per 100 g (312 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) has 0.7 mg and Amchur has 52 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Zerdeçal Tozu (Kurkumin Deposu) 67, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.