Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Yıldız anason tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 691(+105.0%)
Score Diff
66 vs 14(-78.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yıldız anason tohumu
Higher energy
Amerikan cevizi
Score leader
Yıldız anason tohumu
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yıldız anason tohumu and Amerikan cevizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yıldız anason tohumu has 337.0 kcal and Amerikan cevizi has 691.0 kcal. The difference is 354.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yıldız anason tohumu | Amerikan cevizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 311 iu | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.66 mg | +94.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.13 mg | -55.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 0.21 mg | -67.7% |
| Bakir | 0.91 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | 1.1 mg | -94.8% |
| Demir | 36.96 mg | 2.53 mg | -93.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.6 g | 9.6 g | -34.2% |
| Fosfor | 440 mg | 277 mg | -37.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 646 mg | 70 mg | -89.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 50 g | 13.86 g | -72.3% |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 121 mg | -28.8% |
| Mangan | 2.3 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 3.06 mg | 1.17 mg | -61.8% |
| Potasyum | 1441 mg | 410 mg | -71.5% |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 9.17 g | -47.9% |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | — | — |
| Su | 9.54 g | 3.52 g | -63.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 6.18 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | 22 µg | +120.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 40.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 15.9 g | 71.97 g | +352.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 21.6 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 3.97 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.3 mg | 4.53 mg | -14.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yıldız anason tohumu and Amerikan cevizi.
Yıldız anason tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 691 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Yıldız anason tohumu has 15.9 g and Amerikan cevizi has 71.97 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yıldız anason tohumu 66, Amerikan cevizi 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.