Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Yıldız anason tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 573(+70.0%)
Score Diff
66 vs 46(-30.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yıldız anason tohumu
Higher energy
Altın Susam
Score leader
Yıldız anason tohumu
Nutrient split
7 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yıldız anason tohumu and Altın Susam are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yıldız anason tohumu has 337.0 kcal and Altın Susam has 573.0 kcal. The difference is 236.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yıldız anason tohumu | Altın Susam | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 311 iu | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.79 mg | +132.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.25 mg | -13.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 0.79 mg | +21.5% |
| Bakir | 0.91 mg | 4.08 mg | +348.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 36.96 mg | 14.55 mg | -60.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.6 g | 11.8 g | -19.2% |
| Fosfor | 440 mg | 629 mg | +43.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 646 mg | 975 mg | +50.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 50 g | 23.45 g | -53.1% |
| Kül | — | 4.46 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 351 mg | +106.5% |
| Mangan | 2.3 mg | 2.46 mg | +7.0% |
| Niasin | 3.06 mg | 4.52 mg | +47.7% |
| Potasyum | 1441 mg | 468 mg | -67.5% |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 17.73 g | +0.7% |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 11 mg | -31.3% |
| Su | 9.54 g | 4.69 g | -50.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 6.96 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | 97 µg | +870.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 18.76 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 15.9 g | 49.67 g | +212.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 21.77 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.3 mg | 7.75 mg | +46.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yıldız anason tohumu and Altın Susam.
Yıldız anason tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 573 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Yıldız anason tohumu has 10 µg and Altın Susam has 97 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yıldız anason tohumu 66, Altın Susam 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.