Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Yeşil Mercimek has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
352 vs 337(-4.3%)
Score Diff
42 vs 38(-9.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil Mercimek
Higher energy
Yeşil Mercimek
Score leader
Yeşil Mercimek
Nutrient split
10 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yeşil Mercimek and Anasazi fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yeşil Mercimek has 352.0 kcal and Anasazi fasulyesi has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yeşil Mercimek | Anasazi fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.7 mg | -19.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.2 mg | -4.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | 0.4 mg | -25.9% |
| Bakir | 0.52 mg | 0.8 mg | +53.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 7.54 mg | 5.1 mg | -32.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.7 g | 15.2 g | +42.1% |
| Folat DFE | 479 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 451 mg | 410 mg | -9.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 56 mg | 135 mg | +141.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 63.35 g | 61.3 g | -3.2% |
| Kül | 2.5 g | 4.2 g | +68.0% |
| Magnezyum | 122 mg | 170 mg | +39.3% |
| Mangan | 1.35 mg | 1.1 mg | -18.5% |
| Niasin | 2.6 mg | 2.1 mg | -19.2% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.7 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 955 mg | 1360 mg | +42.4% |
| Protein | 24.63 g | 21.5 g | -12.7% |
| Selenyum | 11 µg | 12.8 µg | +16.4% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 12 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 8.46 g | 11.8 g | +39.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.15 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 525 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.17 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.06 g | 1.2 g | +13.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.53 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.03 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.78 mg | 2.8 mg | -41.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yeşil Mercimek and Anasazi fasulyesi.
Anasazi fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 352 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Yeşil Mercimek has 56 mg and Anasazi fasulyesi has 135 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yeşil Mercimek 42, Anasazi fasulyesi 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.