Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) has a higher nutrition quality score (20) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
52 vs 57(+9.6%)
Score Diff
20 vs 19(-5.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith)
Higher energy
Akça armut
Score leader
Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith)
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) and Akça armut are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) has 52.0 kcal and Akça armut has 57.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) | Akça armut | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.017 mg | 0.012 mg | -29.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | 0.026 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.041 mg | 0.029 mg | -29.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 27 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.6 mg | 4.3 mg | -6.5% |
| Demir | 0.15 mg | 0.18 mg | +20.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 3.1 g | +10.7% |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 12 mg | 0.0% |
| Fruktoz | 5.7 g | 6.22 g | +9.1% |
| Glikoz | 1.8 g | 2.76 g | +53.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.2 µg | 4.4 µg | +100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 9 mg | +80.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.61 g | 15.2 g | +11.7% |
| Magnezyum | 5 mg | 7 mg | +40.0% |
| Malik asit | 850 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.161 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 120 mg | 116 mg | -3.3% |
| Protein | 0.44 g | 0.36 g | -18.2% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.5 g | 0.77 g | -48.7% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 1 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 85.7 g | 83.8 g | -2.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 3 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.19 g | 0.14 g | -26.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.59 g | 9.75 g | +1.7% |
| Çinko | 0.05 mg | 0.1 mg | +100.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) and Akça armut.
Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) has less energy per 100 g (52 kcal versus 57 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) has 2.2 µg and Akça armut has 4.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yeşil Elma (Granny Smith) 20, Akça armut 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.